Our ISP Internet Carrier Partners

If you’re evaluating fiber availability for a site, expansion, relocation, or carrier change, this advisory helps you validate what’s actually available (and what isn’t)—before provider selection, route commitments, or contracts create long-term dependency. 

• Evaluate availability claims (what “serviceable” really means, and what’s assumed vs verified)
• Surface infrastructure constraints (building access, MPOE, risers, right-of-way, timelines, landlord dependencies)
• Assess route diversity and dependency exposure (true diversity vs shared conduits, single points of failure)
• Compare provider options (coverage, reach, escalation posture, contract mechanics, portability risk)
• Document a decision path (what must be true before committing to a provider, route, or build)

Bradley Partner supports fiber infrastructure decisions at the decision stage, before providers are selected, routes are committed, or contracts are executed. Engagements focus on evaluating fiber availability, infrastructure constraints, provider coverage assumptions, and long-term dependency implications while choices are still flexible—so connectivity decisions don’t become a lasting operational and financial constraint.

Fiber availability is often treated as a simple coverage question, but the highest risk occurs earlier. Assumptions about route diversity, provider reach, building access, and long-term dependency are frequently made before they are validated. The downstream impact can be predictable: limited resiliency, surprise construction timelines, non-portable contracts, and avoidable cost.

Bradley Partner operates upstream of execution to help organizations understand what fiber information matters, how availability claims should be interpreted, and what risks and constraints exist—before committing to providers, construction, or contracts.

•  Fiber Availability & Coverage Assessment
• Route Diversity & Dependency Risk Evaluation
• Provider Feasibility & Access Constraints
• Commercial & Contractual Implications of Fiber Decisions
• Fiber Decisions in Network & Site Strategy

Across the fiber availability decision areas listed, Bradley Partner supports decision-stage choices before providers are selected, routes are committed, construction is initiated, or contracts are executed. The decision focus is to:

• Define the connectivity intent: what the site or network must enable (capacity, latency posture, resiliency targets, timeline constraints) and what “success” means operationally and financially.
• Set explicit boundaries: what is in scope (sites, services, diversity expectations), what is out of scope, and what requires executive sign-off before commitment.
• Validate availability claims and assumptions: distinguish “on-net/near-net/serviceable” narratives from decision-grade reality, and identify what evidence is required.
• Surface infrastructure constraints and dependencies: building access, landlord approvals, right-of-way realities, POP proximity, and any hidden single points of failure.
• Compare viable options: provider alternatives, diversity postures, and contract pathways using decision-grade criteria—not coverage marketing.
• Assess tradeoffs and long-term exposure: understand dependency concentration, construction timeline risk, portability/exit constraints, and commercial mechanics before commitments reduce flexibility.
• Establish governance posture: decision rights, documentation expectations, risk acceptance thresholds, and auditability for future scrutiny.

Engagements conclude with a decision-ready package leadership can approve and sourcing/engineering teams can execute against, including:

• Decision inventory + decision rights (what must be decided, by whom, by when)
• Coverage and availability findings (decision-grade interpretation of provider claims and feasibility)
• Route diversity and dependency analysis (where diversity is real vs shared; concentration points)
• Access and constraint summary (building/MPOE/riser/landlord/ROW dependencies and timing implications)
• Options comparison + tradeoff matrix (providers, diversity posture, cost, risk, flexibility, timeline)
• Commercial exposure summary (term structure, construction clauses, SLAs, renewals, exit constraints, portability)
• Network and site-strategy alignment considerations (how fiber decisions constrain or enable broader plans)
• Executive recommendation with assumptions, accepted risks, and explicit “what must be true” conditions
• Sign-off artifacts for auditability (what was considered, what was rejected, and why)